DeepResource

Observing the world of renewable energy and sustainable living

Archive for the month “February, 2015”

IJmuiden Ver – 6 GW Windpower Potential

ijmuiden-ver
Dutch offshore industry proposes to install up to 6 GW wind power in the cyan colored part of the North Sea, bordering the British part of the continental shelf.

The Dutch offshore industry was so kind to offer a helping hand in the dispute where to install a handful of gigawatt Dutch wind power: 60 km from the coast rather than 15 km.

[4coffshore.com] – IJmuiden Wind Farm Zone

Brent Oil Price on the Rise Again

brent-year[nasdaq.com]

Brent oil price increased with 6% yesterday to $62, recovering from a minimum of $50 on January 20, 2015. June last year: $110

Editor: if the oil price can be more than halved in six months, it can also double in six months. Low oil prices encourage economic growth, which increases demand for oil, which increases prices. On top of that, a lot of North-American production facilities with high operational costs are being driven out of business due to the low oil price. It could take some time to get them started again. Perhaps Vlad’s purse will be full again next year.

[telegraaf.nl] – Olieprijs loopt stevig op

Stalingrad

Joseph Stalin's Mug Shots
Police mug shot of Georgian serial bank robber #3316 and butcher of Russia, Iosif Vissarionovich Dzhugashvili aka Stalin (‘man of steel’)

We couldn’t believe our eyes, but yes, there it stood: quite a few in Russia want to rename Volgograd back into… Stalingrad!

The NGO Memorial, which specializes in documenting the history of the Stalinist purges, has sharply criticized a proposal to erect a monument to Josef Stalin in Moscow and to rename the city of Volgograd as Stalingrad.

We are highly skeptical about the phenomenon of NGO, which we see as anti-democratic (usually leftist) pressure groups, but this time we agree. Why on earth would you want to erect a monument in Moscow, or worse, make yourself the laughing stock of the entire world, by renaming a city after the largest criminal your country (or rather a neighboring satellite country) has produced?

What’s next, rename Murmansk into Gulaggrad? Novosibirsk in Beriabirsk? Irkutsk into Trotzkytown?

Nevertheless, in a cynical way, Stalin did something good after all. Stalin was such a thug, that he out-thugged the Wallstreet-subsidized Trotskyite, US-oriented branch of communism. And then you have to be a real thug.

trotsky
Hole in one! Trotsky icepicked in Mexico by Stalins agents.

That was the real reason why the good palls USA and USSR parted after 1945, after they had combined forces since 1933, when Stalin-groupie Roosevelt came to power, to destroy Europe and divided the loot between them and organized the Stalinist Nuremberg show trial to construct the self-serving allied lies, virulent until today and carefully kept alive by the mob in Washington, their European satraps and Hollywood. Destroy the Nuremberg myths and you have destroyed the West. And precisely for that reason, at some point Putin could be tempted to produce his last trump card: make the contents of his WW2 archives public.

The renaissance of European civilization (Paris-Berlin-Moscow) can only happen on the ruins of Nuremberg and the Death of the West. In 2015 there is nothing more revolutionary you can do than reading the right books. The Stalinists no longer exist, but the Trotskyites are still at large, but call themselves neocons these days and run Washington, like Trotsky ran Soviet-Russia, shortly after the revolution. And these neocons have precisely the same revolutionary zeal and aim as the Bolsheviks: world government.

[rt.com] – Leading NGO opposes plan to rename Russian city ‘Stalingrad’

This dramatized and very professionally made documentary was shown on Russian television, discussing the Suvorov-hypothesis, namely that Stalin and not Hitler was responsible for Barbarossa [Here Hitler explaining the Molotov-Ribbentrop agreement and why he invaded Russia (9:01), no not for ‘Lebensraum’, but because he preempted a Russian attack with a few weeks, completely in line with Suvorov]. Russia is slowly moving towards revising history. Forget about the idea that the fake ‘free West’ would ever contemplate airing this kind of information. The American led West defeated the East between 1989-1991. Now, Putin-Russia (and China in the background) can help continental Europe to liberate itself from Anglosphere and abolish the West and when that task is completed, the newly created Euro-Siberian confederation can begin to liberate Euro-America from neocon-run Washington and bring a Ron Paul/Edward Snowden type to power. 1776 revisited.

EWEA – Potential Floating Wind Turbines Enormous

Floating wind turbines in deep waters offer an enormous potential for producing wind energy, says the European Wind Energy Association. According to the EWEA, the relatively small area of the North Sea is sufficient to produce four times more electricity from wind than Europe currently consumes (report July 2013).

[groenecourant.nl]

iCar

icar[source]

Apple has a problem: too much money ($178B). What do most companies do in this situation: expand and invest in new territories; after all, a human may have two ears, but only one mouth, so it does not make sense to have two iPhones.

What territories to expand in? Apple is hiring people with an automotive background, according to the WSJ up to 1000 people. Rumors about a project code-named “Titan”. More indications: battery company A123 Systems is suing Apple for snatching away valuable top technicians.

We’ll be curious to learn how the iCar is going to look like, perhaps a mix between a Fiat 500 and an iPhone, no doubt online as you drive, instruct your car by voice what your destination is. Start the car: tap an icon. Update the latest software while you drive. Cruise control, perhaps even automatic driving; currently many companies are working on that. No doubt electric, perhaps integrated solar cells, low energy consumption, fuel cells, sold as a ‘green car’.

[wsj.com] – What Apple Is Driving At
[spiegel.de] – Designer über Apple-Auto: “Es muss begeistern, nicht verschrecken”

Global Wind Statistics 2014

wind-2014

2014 was a good year for wind energy. Never before was so much new capacity installed.

[gwec.net] – Global Wind Statistics 2014

Wind Turbine Lifespan

hughes
Gordon Hughes: windbag and shill for the fracking industry, producing hot air when he opens his mouth.

Here is an article from 2012 where a prof Gordon Hughes is launching a frontal attack against wind power:

[dailymail.co.uk] – Wind turbines ‘only lasting for half as long as previously thought’

Wind turbines ‘only lasting for half as long as previously thought’ as study shows they show signs of wearing out after just 12 years… A study of almost 3,000 turbines in Britain – the largest of its kind – sheds doubt on manufacturers claims that they generate clean energy for up to 25 years, which is used by the Government to calculate subsidies… In Denmark, where wind power has been used for longer, the decline in output was less dramatic, which he said could be down to their smaller size and possibly better maintenanceHis report for the anti-wind farm charity the Renewable Energy Foundation (KEEP), noted: ‘Onshore wind turbines represent a relatively mature technology, which ought to have achieved a satisfactory level of reliability in operation as plants age.

The British government is not impressed by the arguments put forward by Hughes:

A spokesman said: ‘Our expectations of wind turbine lifetimes are based on rigorous analysis and evidence. Britain’s oldest commercial turbines at Delabole in Cornwall have only recently been replaced after 20 years of operation, and the technology has come on leaps and bounds since that project started generating in 1991.

Professor Gordon who?

[Gordon Hughes – The myth of green jobs]

[scotsman.com] – No fracking ‘will lead to sky high prices’

The fracking debate has been hijacked by “political posturing” and could leave Scots stuck with sky high energy bills compared with other parts of the world, a leading economist has warned. Professor Gordon Hughes, a former world bank adviser, warned Scotland could be sleepwalking into key decisions over its energy future without a “genuine debate about reality rather than phantasms”.

Well, the good professor has a horse in this race and that is fracking. On top of that he formulated his opinions for an anti-wind platform.

So, what do the wind energy ‘paid shills’ have to say about Hughes study?

[ewea.org] – Study on turbine lifespan is “just more anti-wind propaganda”

The article does not really address the figures Hughes is giving. Instead they point at the anonymous peer review and that the professor has a history of being anti-wind and refers to the official British government pro-wind stance.

Here is a more detailed study that also addresses the findings of Hughes:

[sciencedirect.com] – How does wind farm performance decline with age?

We find the ageing effect to be present, but much smaller than predicted by Hughes, in line with experience of other rotating machinery… We find evidence of important, but not disastrous, performance degradation over time in a large sample of UK wind farms. When variations in the weather and improvement in turbine design are accounted for, we find that the load factors of UK wind farms fall by 1.57% (0.41 percentage points) per year.

[renewablesinternational.net] – Wind turbines for 40 years?

And here is a German wind power specialist saying that the official 20 years life span of a wind turbine is often related to the time of a permit and says nothing about the economic life span. Herr Romberg suggests that with proper maintenance wind turbines can operate for 40 years, not 10-15 years as Hughes suggests.

Editor: electricity generation with wind energy is a relatively new technology and there are hardly enough older turbines around to test the claim that these turbines have a life span of 20-25 years. As a rule technology improves with time, and modern turbines can’t be compared with the shabby machines produced 20 years ago. And as the professor indicates himself: maintenance is very important. And since wind in Denmark is not really that different from wind in the UK, longer life spans in Denmark must have to do with better maintenance. But if a commercial airliner, like a Boeing 747, can be operational for decades on end, spending more time in the skies than on the ground and having to deal with vastly higher wind speeds and stresses than wind turbines, than it is safe to conclude that mature wind power technology will be able to deliver turbine designs that can last decades as well.

As a reminder: the Eiffel tower has been around since 1889, that is 126 years. Yale estimates that the tower could last another 2-3 centuries. There is no reason to assume that steel wind turbine towers could not last a similar long time span. Here is an example of a Dutch windmill from 1458 or older and still works. In Havana there are almost exclusively cars around from the fifties and not even particularly well maintained. Maintenance is everything.

Century old T-Ford

Apple Goes Solar ($850M)

Apple-solar-farm[source]

Apple is to build a new giant solar installation (5 km2) in California to power its new headquarters in Cupertino. First Solar is to carry out the job. Apple already has experience with solar energy and fuel cells in Maiden/North-Carolina. Current company value: $711B, higher than any other company in the history of the US, indicating where the future of the economy is heading:

*** solid state physics (IT + solar energy) ***

Meanwhile, Apple has the insane amount of $178B cash reserves, that’s an equivalent of 100+ GW solar power, or 100+ conventional power stations.
Hint: Apple could become very big in solar power and the catalyst of the global solar power revolution.

[spiegel.de] – Kalifornien: Apple setzt auf Sonne
[businessinsider.com] – Apple is spending $850 million to build a giant solar farm

solar-apple
Apple solar Maiden/North-Carolina

[macrumors.com] – Apple Strikes Deal for Third Solar Farm at North Carolina Data Center

Stella Solar Car Wins Silicon Valley Tech Award

This car is a reasonable solution for personal transport in a post-carbon world in territories like Australia, Africa, SW-USA, Middle-East and southern Europe and even in cloudy lands like Holland. Over a year this car generates more energy than it actually consumes.

[nos.nl] – Nederlandse zonnewagen Stella wint ‘Oscar’ in Silicon Valley
[geenstijl.nl] – NL studenten winnen Oscar van de techniek

Pictures from Solar Challenge 2013. Shows advantages of Australia for the coming ‘solar age’. Predictable and intense sun shine, providing abundant energy, enough to propel three adults in a stream-lined car with an average speed of 77 kmh, bridging up to 700 km in one day.

Read more…

Wind Power From 600 Meter Altitude

At 600 m altitutide the energy density is 5=8 times higher than near ground level. The floating wind turbine is designed to take advantage of that fact.

Most likely application: remote areas, like Alaska and Siberia or in disaster stricken areas to replace diesel generators.

[spiegel.de] – Windrad liefert Strom aus 600 Meter Höhe
[altaerosenergies.com]
[wikipedia.org] – Airborne wind turbine
[gizmag.com] – Floating wind turbines to produce low cost renewable energy

Hydraulic Fracturing Animation

Be a Photon

… and travel through the solar system, obviously with the speed of light, starting from the sun, without smashing into a solar panel. Promised. It takes 43 minutes to reach Jupiter. Travelling further to Saturn would take another half hour and is not included.

[rt.com] – Seeing stars: Traverse Solar System at speed of light

Prices Solar Systems

Country Residential Commercial Utility_scale
China 1.5 1.4 1.4
Australia 1.8 1.7 2.0
Germany 2.4 1.8 1.4
Italy 2.8 1.9 1.5
UK 2.8 2.4 1.9
France 4.1 2.7 2.2
Japan 4.2 3.6 2.9
USA 4.9 4.5 3.3

Prices in $/Watt

This explains why Germany, China, Italy and Australia are at the forefront in installing photo-voltaic systems.

[wikipedia.org] – Solar cell

How Solar Panels are Made

Bosch video showing the production process of a solar cell.

We have had the Ice Age, Stone Age, the Bronze Age, the Iron Age, the Fossil Fuel Age and now we are entering the Sand Age (Silicon Age) aka Solar Age.

The size of a typical solar cell is 156 mm * 156 mm…

solar_cell

… and produces ca. 4 Watt peak or 3.7 kwh per year (Holland) or 100 kwh over a 30 year lifetime. If you realize that 1 kwh represents one man-day of hard physical labor, than this tiny piece of silicon is the equivalent of 6 months of hard physical labor, based on 200 working days/year. That’s the power of technology.

That little 250 cm2 piece of silicium with the weight of a few grams is able to lift a car (in 30 years time) to roughly the same altitude from wich Felix Baumgartner jumped.

sandinhand[source]
This amount of sand, after proper transformations, can generate energy, enough to lift a car into the stratosphere.

In order to replace the world’s current energy consumption for 100% with solar, you need to cover an area the size of Spain entirely with solar panels. That’s a daunting task, but it can be done, as long as you still have fossil fuel to produce these panels. Once these panels are in place, they generate enough energy to replace themselves after 25-30 years, considering an EROEI of 30-60 for well-placed modern solar cells.

[youtube]
Production plant of Calyxo GmbH in Bitterfeld-Wolfen, Germany. Production of CdTe Thin Film Solar Module.

Post Navigation