From [1:40] mr Maisky claims, shortly after the beginning of the German attack on the USSR, 22.6.1941, that the USSR did not want this war and that it was forced upon the USSR by Hitler.
Right, and now over to a closed meeting, four years later, in the run-up to the Nuremberg tribunal. Mr. Jackson, the chairman of that tribunal has closely studied the German archives and arrives at a startling and alarming conclusion, the minutes of which mysteriously ended up in the tribunal minutes, probably by mistake by an American clerk who did not understand the significance of the document, completely undermining the validity of the outcome of that trial:
MR. JUSTICE JACKSON. I really think that this trial, if it should get into an argument over the political and economic causes of this war, could do infinite harm, both in Europe, which I don’t know well, and in America, which I know fairly well. If we should have a prolonged controversy over whether Germany invaded Norway a few jumps ahead of a British invasion of Norway, or whether France in declaring war was the real aggressor, this trial can do infinite harm for those countries with the people of the United States. And the same is true of our Russian relationships. The Germans will certainly accuse all three of our European allies of adopting policies which forced them to war. The reason I Say that is that captured documents which we have always made that claim-that Germany would be forced into war. They admit they were planning war, but the captured documents of the Foreign Office that I have examined all come down to the claim, “We have no way out; we must fight; we are encircled; we are being strangled to death.”
Fortunately for the Americans and Soviets, it were them and not an independent judge, who presided over the trial. You see, Americans and Soviets aren’t exactly accustomed to the higest standards of justice, but that is what you can expect from parvenus.
So how did the allies solve this little problem? Simple: Nuremberg public prosecutor Vishinsky, the mastermind of the Moscow show-trials had an idea how to solve that problem.
Andrei Vyshinsky, Moscow 1934.
Vyshinsky’s role in crafting the Soviet legal system in the early 1920s paved the way for Josef Stalin, who “could never get his fill of blood,” to legally turn Russia into a human slaughterhouse. Vyshinsky’s efforts were essential to establishing the legal framework necessary to wrongly convict the millions of people needed to populate the largest and most inhumane prison system ever created – the Gulag Archipelago. And that criminal sat in the chair of the public prosecutor in Nuremberg, judging (inventing?) the crimes of the Germans. And the Americans played along, in their horniness to add western Europe to their empire.
Vyshinsky brought with him a list of nine points that according to the Soviets should not be discussed during the Nuremberg show-trial:
- USSR/Versailles relationship
- Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact
- Molotovs vist to Berlin as well as von Ribbentrop’s visits to Moscow
- Any issues regarding the political system of the USSR
- The Baltics Soviet republics
- Soviet-German agreements regarding exchange of German population from the Baltics
- Soviet foreign policy and more in detail, the straits and Soviet territorial claims
- The Balkans
- Soviet-Polish relations (West-Ukraine/Western Belo-Russia)
Source Vyshinsky: Stefan Scheil
With this list any possibility of German defense was blocked in advance, because the discussion of the context of the war was eliminated. Germany started the war, because Germany crossed the borders first. That was the reasoning.
A Finnish source claims that Americans, Soviets and the Churchill war party had already decided upon the destruction of Germany, even before Germany felt itself forced to intervene in Poland. And that matches precisely with the discovery made by Jackson. If that source is correct, and we strongly suspect it is, than this Maisky chap must have been lying through his teeth in this video.
And indeed, Iwan Maisky had several clandestine meetings with Churchill, leader of the British war party. These meetings took place behind the back of Chamberlain and could have been used to coordinate the planning of the future war between Churchill and Stalin. At the same time, Churchill was on the phone with Roosevelt on a daily basis, just as illegally. And for this we do have proof that Churchill and Roosevelt were plotting for war, long before the US found the Pearl Harbor loop-hole, provoked by the US oil-boycott, to circumvent Congress that blocked US war entry:
Watch this fascinating 25 minute BBC documentary about the American clerk Tyler Kent [mirror part-1, part-2], who oversaw the Roosevelt-Churchill plotting for war against Germany and decided to be a Edward Snowden avant la lettre and warn Congress, at the time not yet a paper tiger. Unfortunately, Churchill intercepted Kent and threw him in jail.
Here a large German archive (see for selected samples below), which must contain the same material Jackson and his crew must have encountered. In the Spring of 1941, German intelligence discovered that the USSR was secretly in a state of full mobilization, from Wladiwostok to Brest-Litovsk and was preparing to overrun Europe and bring the ‘blessings of Bolshevism’ to the shores of the Atlantic. So the Germans had the choice: deal the first blow or wait for the Soviets to deal the first blow. Logically they choose the former and that was the only reason why the Soviet army made it to Berlin and not Amsterdam. But the problem is that if you lose the war, like the Germans did, everybody can accuse you of having started it, even if it is not true. International law knows a provision that allows for preemptive strikes, like the Germans did. But international law in the hands of mass-raping & city nuking Americans or Soviets is of course a joke. They wanted to add Europe to their respective globalist empires and they would not let themselves be distracted by formalities like international law.
We predict that our hero Vladimir Putin, the Russian de Gaulle, will be willing to open his war archive and confirm this explanation of events, provided he will get greater Europe in return and protect the Siberian part of his country from becoming incorporated into the rising Chinese superpower, once the American problem will have been dealt with, so we can start the coming Greater European confederation with a clean slate and Europe, now including Russia, can return to global prominence, where it naturally belongs. The very fact that Putin prudently began to propose a revisionist view lite of the events of WW2, clearly points in the direction of such a willingness. But that was in 2009 and European-Russian relations were very cosy, until the Nuland bunch intervened, early 2014. But we should not be too sad about that event, because as we have stressed before, Paris-Berlin-Moscow could evolve into a death-trap for Europe if it happens prematurely. First the US must fall apart and only the day after we can confederate.
[rapsinews.com] – tellingly the Russian justice ministry resists attempt to criminalize historic revisionism, against what are probably Soviet-apologists in lower echelons of the judiciary.
Samples from German archives: